Ride height question as car looks ready to rally!

An archive of any Porsche 911 technical threads

Moderators: hot66, impmad2000, Barry, Viv_Surby, Derek, Mike Usiskin

Post Reply
IanMcLeod
DDK rules my life!
Posts: 1345
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 8:33 pm
Location: Cornwall

Ride height question as car looks ready to rally!

Post by IanMcLeod »

So Bruce Anderson, Haynes workshop manual, lots of posts on Pelican plus some on here all give the correct way to set ride height as

Front - Wheel center 108mm above torsion bar center +- 5mm.
Rear - Rear wheel center 12mm below torsion bar center +- 5mm.

I thought I would try it on the resto project to test wing clearance, suspension travel etc. Set it accurately to the specs above which was easy as no torsion bars fitted so used jacks to get the exact correct settings.

All I can say is blimey :shock: :shock: :shock:

Car looks like it's ready for the Paris - Dakar rally. Rear arch is about 26" from floor and front is about 26.5". Therefore at least an inch higher than expected before thinking about lowering. Compared to my std E which has 25" and 25.5" it looks way too high. Tires are not the issue as I have compared their size to the correct 185/70s (and 195/65s) and would be slightly worse with these tires (26.5" rear, 27" front). It can't be right.

My questions are

1/ Are the specs given in all these books just wrong?
2/ If so anybody know actual usable specs for 72/73 cars.

Ian.
CarreraRS
DDK addict
Posts: 119
Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 7:38 am

RS Ride Height

Post by CarreraRS »

When I set my 73 RS ride height I used the factory spec book for the rear trailing plate angle and it looked ridiculous. Like a dragster. It sat really high without the engine and I thought it would come down to the correct height with the enhine installed. It didn't. I had to re do it until it looked right.

Cheers

Paul
Regards
Paul

1950 356 Cab
1957 356 Carrera Coupe
1958 356 Coupe 1600S RHD
1961 356 Roadster
1973 911 RS Carrera RHD
1979 930 Turbo RHD
2015 GT3 (Sold)
1989 962
1989 962
1989 962
cubist
The Fenland Feltcher
Posts: 4044
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2003 12:48 pm

Post by cubist »

My manual says the same but with a later addendum:

'Front - Wheel center 108mm above torsion bar center +- 5mm.
Rear - Rear wheel center 12mm below torsion bar center +- 5mm...
Oh, vot ist zeez Dumbkopf? Just slam und be done viz eet! yours Ferry xxx'


:wink:
C U B I S T - 1 1 1 5

'83 Triumph Acclaim - 3sp Auto (cat D)
Singer 3232 - Titanium bobbin, Autothread
'67 Gresham Flyer - Puncture, rear
Sherbet Lemons - 4oz, loose
Motorola - PG 2000, locked
210bhp
Nurse, I think I need some assistance
Posts: 8056
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 12:28 am
Location: Scotland

Post by 210bhp »

Ian

Never fear, the stick man is here.......


you must be going wrong somewhere cos the figures you have are correct. Have a read at this and see what you come up with

http://www.ddk-online.com/phpBB2/viewto ... hth+height


Regards
Mike
_____________________________
73 RS (Sold)
67 S
Mint T (Sold)
996 Turbo (Sold)
73 2.4E (home after 25 years) and Sold again :-(
73T targa (signal yellow project)
1953 Vauxhall Velox
914/6
1963 356B
https://www.mybespokeroom.com/
IanMcLeod
DDK rules my life!
Posts: 1345
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 8:33 pm
Location: Cornwall

Post by IanMcLeod »

cubist wrote:My manual says the same but with a later addendum:

'Front - Wheel center 108mm above torsion bar center +- 5mm.
Rear - Rear wheel center 12mm below torsion bar center +- 5mm...
Oh, vot ist zeez Dumbkopf? Just slam und be done viz eet! yours Ferry xxx'


:wink:
Now that made me laugh :lol:
IanMcLeod
DDK rules my life!
Posts: 1345
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 8:33 pm
Location: Cornwall

Post by IanMcLeod »

210bhp wrote:Ian

Never fear, the stick man is here.......


you must be going wrong somewhere cos the figures you have are correct. Have a read at this and see what you come up with

http://www.ddk-online.com/phpBB2/viewto ... hth+height


Regards
Mike
Interesting read because FMAN used the same settings as me and ends up with the same problem as I have of being about an inch too high. The thread doesn't resolve why so there seems to be a mismatch between official spec and the reality of arch height.

I have checked my sill heights too and there is difference of about an inch all the way down the sill between the car I have just done (appox 33cm) and my E (approx 30cm) with it's 25" high arches. If I set the car to have the same sill height as my E it looks much better and has the correct arch heights but then the suspension point measurements no longer work.

Puzzled ...

Ian.
Post Reply