Page 1 of 1

New 997 Turbo pictures

Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2006 11:19 pm
by bjmullan
Love the front of the new 997 but the back is a bit disappointing, just too slabby for my liking Love the front of the new 997 but the back is a bit disappointing, just too slabby for my liking, but the pictures I have seen of the new Turbo are really nice and the new fixed spoiler seems to break up the rear and makes the car look at lot better. What do you lot think?

I was just wondering if anyone in 2043 will be online at a website looking for a microchip for a 2006 Classic Porsche 997? :roll:

Pictures from Autocar

Image

Image

Re: New 997 Turbo pictures

Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2006 11:25 pm
by pmjt
bjmullan wrote:the new fixed spoiler seems to break up the rear and makes the car look at lot better
Spoiler will lift at speed a la 996 TT.

p

Posted: Wed Feb 15, 2006 8:25 am
by PAUL CALDERBANK
If you think the new turbo looks nice, you should take a look at the new GT3! That car really does look the part. 8)

Posted: Wed Feb 15, 2006 8:30 am
by Gary71
It's strange that the arse of the 997 is getting so long now that it looks like a SWB! :)

Posted: Wed Feb 15, 2006 5:18 pm
by MdR
It also has ugly wheels.

Posted: Wed Feb 15, 2006 7:17 pm
by fourteener
it also has FUGLY wheels...

Posted: Wed Feb 15, 2006 9:03 pm
by Gary71
Now maybe Porsche should consider a more retro option... :)

Image

Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 11:46 am
by Dyno Soar
I like it with the Fuchs. :) I'm probably the only guy not to be exited by this car. It just doesn't look that different.

When you look at proper flared arch turbo from days gone by it looked so dramatic. This has no drama.. well in the pics at least.

Ok I'll get my flat cap and go back to my shed.. young uns with there plastic cars! Humbug! :? :P

Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 4:55 pm
by MdR
Gary71 wrote:Now maybe Porsche should consider a more retro option... :)

Image
You see? How hard is that to understand? Porsche! make Fuchs in the correct sizes & offsets for your modern cars, you flog thousands of 'em! (and do a closer rep. than Paul Stephens)