Page 6 of 9

Re: '65

Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2023 5:44 pm
by inaglasshouse
Inner wings, in the RH wheel arch, quite a bit worse than I expected in an isolated area. This was covered by original underseal on the outside and original bitumen-type sound deadener on the inside, neither of which were removed before Enviro Strip, so this bit of rot was hidden until now.

(LH similar but much smaller area of rot).

Image

Image

That's about it for rust. Slightly worse than I'd hoped, but not terrible.

Re: '65

Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2023 7:09 pm
by yoda
Not bad at all!

Re: '65

Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2023 8:22 pm
by MarkIII
All in all looks a very solid car considering its age. I am sure Barry will it all sorted in a jiffy

Re: '65

Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2023 11:49 am
by RobFrost
That is basically a mint condition shell in my book.

Re: '65

Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2023 8:29 am
by inaglasshouse
inaglasshouse wrote: Sat Oct 07, 2023 5:36 pm On that subject, I've been pricing up a few panels and looking back at the spreadsheet from last time. There would appear to have been some pretty rampant price inflation (and the genuine Porsche panels weren't exactly cheap when I did the previous resto). I guess in some cases that will skew the economics toward starting with a flat bit of metal.
Here's a thing... I retract my point about price inflation for Porsche genuine panels. Up about 20% in 5-6 years, which seems entirely reasonable.
Wider market for parts, inc 3rd party panels, appears to have inflated rather more.

Re: '65

Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 4:14 pm
by IanM
inaglasshouse wrote: Tue Oct 17, 2023 8:29 am Up about 20% in 5-6 years, which seems entirely reasonable.
Yes, not bad.

Is the shell at Barry's now?

Re: '65

Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 8:01 pm
by inaglasshouse
IanM wrote: Sat Oct 21, 2023 4:14 pm
inaglasshouse wrote: Tue Oct 17, 2023 8:29 am Up about 20% in 5-6 years, which seems entirely reasonable.
Yes, not bad.

Is the shell at Barry's now?
Indeed. Not long now before we have some quality content for the resto thread, I reckon.

Re: '65

Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2023 3:49 pm
by IanM
Any updates?

Re: '65

Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2023 9:27 am
by inaglasshouse
IanM wrote: Sun Nov 19, 2023 3:49 pmAny updates?
Not yet, but thanks for asking. There's some kind of Jag in the way :wink:

Re: '65

Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2023 8:02 pm
by jtparr
:oops:

Re: '65

Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2023 8:56 am
by inaglasshouse
jtparr wrote: Tue Nov 21, 2023 8:02 pm:oops:
No rush, all chill here. I'm keeping Steve busy with the G Wagen in the meantime :)

Re: '65

Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2023 5:18 pm
by jtparr
:)

Re: '65

Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2024 2:48 am
by inaglasshouse
Work has begun.
Most of the words (and all of the useful ones) for a while now will be Barry's. He shall be italicised.

To start with, method of removing fasteners: weld a nut over the broken bit, thermal shock tends to free most things even if it takes a few goes. removed the seat-belt bolt in same way.

Image

Image

Image

Re: '65

Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2024 2:51 am
by inaglasshouse
Floors now all straight other than under the centre-tunnel, which we'll do when on the spit.

These are the original floors. Lovely. This kind of luck will not last...

Image

Image

Re: '65

Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2024 6:59 am
by yoda
inaglasshouse wrote: Sun Feb 25, 2024 2:51 am Floors now all straight other than under the centre-tunnel, which we'll do when on the spit.

These are the original floors. Lovely. This kind of luck will not last...

Image

Image
Wow, that looks amazing for original floors!