Oh yes another 1973 rhd 2.4E
Moderator: Bootsy
-
911GP
- DDK forever
- Posts: 651
- Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2015 3:43 pm
Re: Oh yes another 1973 rhd 2.4E
You can have two point lap belts but I think 3 point are far safer. I'm planning on fitting the latter. Quickfit SBS in Stanmore are supposed to be very good and can easily sort out whichever option you prefer.
-
vimal
- DDK addict
- Posts: 116
- Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2015 5:18 pm
- Location: London
Re: Oh yes another 1973 rhd 2.4E
I am having 3 point seat belts installed in my 2.4E - and I had mounting points added for them during the metal work stage. They are safer than the lap belt option and as this car will be a daily/regular driver I felt more comfortable with this . On my S I've just had lap belts installed - as the mounting points were already there and I didn't want to drill into the metal. I had them installed by Autofarm and I'm pleased with the look. I don't think that 3 point belts were an option - hence the need for mounting points to be added (but I may be wrong on this)
vimal
vimal
- inaglasshouse
- DDK 1st, 2nd and 3rd for me!
- Posts: 2450
- Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2014 9:35 pm
- Location: Surrey, UK
Re: Oh yes another 1973 rhd 2.4E
Personally - lap belts using the original mounting points. So 2 point.
Belts re-made by Dave (stretch) using my original catches and new webbing in correct orange trace pattern.
Let's be honest - an early 911 is a death trap compared with a modern car. I think 2-point vs 3-point rear belts are only going to make a small difference to that. If I want to be safe, it's the BMW for me.
Passive safety is one area where the state of the art has moved on beyond recognition since the seventies. The Euro NCAP folks recently released this 20th anniversary video comparing a 1997 Rover 100 and today's Honda Jazz, quite interesting:
http://news.thatcham.org/videos/euro-nc ... jazz-27292
I like to bear this stuff in mind (plus my knowledge of the driving skills of my various Range Rover driving neighbours), especially when I have children in the car.
As with the bonnet brooms, let's be careful out there!
Cheers, Richard.
Belts re-made by Dave (stretch) using my original catches and new webbing in correct orange trace pattern.
Let's be honest - an early 911 is a death trap compared with a modern car. I think 2-point vs 3-point rear belts are only going to make a small difference to that. If I want to be safe, it's the BMW for me.
Passive safety is one area where the state of the art has moved on beyond recognition since the seventies. The Euro NCAP folks recently released this 20th anniversary video comparing a 1997 Rover 100 and today's Honda Jazz, quite interesting:
http://news.thatcham.org/videos/euro-nc ... jazz-27292
I like to bear this stuff in mind (plus my knowledge of the driving skills of my various Range Rover driving neighbours), especially when I have children in the car.
As with the bonnet brooms, let's be careful out there!
Cheers, Richard.
- yoda
- I need to get out more!
- Posts: 3291
- Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 6:01 am
- Location: London
Re: Oh yes another 1973 rhd 2.4E
I take my kids out regularly in my 911E and wouldn't take them with a lap belt only. Quickfit SBS did my 3 point belts and they were very good.
Last edited by yoda on Tue Feb 21, 2017 9:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The force is strong in this one ......
- hot66
- Moderator
- Posts: 19219
- Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2003 4:17 pm
- Location: North Yorkshire
Oh yes another 1973 rhd 2.4E
It's not always the big accidents, but even the little bumps. Kids in the back and 3 point will make a difference over 2 point in the event of even a little bump ... You don't really want their bodies snapping forward as the y would without a shoulder restraint . I know my wife would never let me take the kids in the back without 3 points .. This is probabally the biggest factor in wether to fit 3 points
With the bigger picture of car safety, it is what it is and yes for day to day duties a modern car is the choice ( the reason I put my wife in a new 5 series for her 20k miles per year school run) , but that doesn't mean you can't take the kids out in an old car on a sunny Sunday .... In these situations it doesn't mean we can't give that little bit of extra protection of 3 points in the rear.
Saying that, my eldest daughter has now got to the point where her head is in contact with the rear window when she's sat in the back which does kind of draw a line regarding safety
With the bigger picture of car safety, it is what it is and yes for day to day duties a modern car is the choice ( the reason I put my wife in a new 5 series for her 20k miles per year school run) , but that doesn't mean you can't take the kids out in an old car on a sunny Sunday .... In these situations it doesn't mean we can't give that little bit of extra protection of 3 points in the rear.
Saying that, my eldest daughter has now got to the point where her head is in contact with the rear window when she's sat in the back which does kind of draw a line regarding safety
James
1973 911 2.4S
1993 964 C2
2010 987 Spyder
1963 Honda C100 Supercub
Its not how fast you go, but how you go fast
1973 911 2.4S
1993 964 C2
2010 987 Spyder
1963 Honda C100 Supercub
Its not how fast you go, but how you go fast
- hot66
- Moderator
- Posts: 19219
- Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2003 4:17 pm
- Location: North Yorkshire
Oh yes another 1973 rhd 2.4E
Adam, if no belt mounts in the rear shelf, you drill then use spreader plates. You'll be wanting inertia real belts in the rear.
I have inertia 3 points in the back of mine and original fixed 3 points in the front
I have inertia 3 points in the back of mine and original fixed 3 points in the front
James
1973 911 2.4S
1993 964 C2
2010 987 Spyder
1963 Honda C100 Supercub
Its not how fast you go, but how you go fast
1973 911 2.4S
1993 964 C2
2010 987 Spyder
1963 Honda C100 Supercub
Its not how fast you go, but how you go fast
- inaglasshouse
- DDK 1st, 2nd and 3rd for me!
- Posts: 2450
- Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2014 9:35 pm
- Location: Surrey, UK
Re: Oh yes another 1973 rhd 2.4E
James, fair points, every little helps.
Come to think of it I have never taken my kids in the back of a 911 with lap belts. And probably never will - my 69 car doesn't have rear seats, so my favourite child gets the front (with race harnesses). And by the time my 70 car is finished they will be too big to fit in the back...
Come to think of it I have never taken my kids in the back of a 911 with lap belts. And probably never will - my 69 car doesn't have rear seats, so my favourite child gets the front (with race harnesses). And by the time my 70 car is finished they will be too big to fit in the back...
-
Bigfoot
- DDK slapper chatter
- Posts: 398
- Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 8:40 pm
Re: Oh yes another 1973 rhd 2.4E
Crikey they've come on a long way!! 1973 911 will probably end up a foot longinaglasshouse wrote:Personally - lap belts using the original mounting points. So 2 point.
Belts re-made by Dave (stretch) using my original catches and new webbing in correct orange trace pattern.
Let's be honest - an early 911 is a death trap compared with a modern car. I think 2-point vs 3-point rear belts are only going to make a small difference to that. If I want to be safe, it's the BMW for me.
Passive safety is one area where the state of the art has moved on beyond recognition since the seventies. The Euro NCAP folks recently released this 20th anniversary video comparing a 1997 Rover 100 and today's Honda Jazz, quite interesting:
http://news.thatcham.org/videos/euro-nc ... jazz-27292
I like to bear this stuff in mind (plus my knowledge of the driving skills of my various Range Rover driving neighbours), especially when I have children in the car.
As with the bonnet brooms, let's be careful out there!
Cheers, Richard.
Thanks for info guys always great to get a balanced view on here. Barry and I did 'skirt' around the subject at one point, but my fault, I forgot to confirm.... oops
Adam
1973 911 2.4E
1974 911 2.7 Ratrod
1973 911 2.4E
1974 911 2.7 Ratrod
-
964RS
- Nurse, I think I need some assistance
- Posts: 6558
- Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 9:53 pm
- Location: Midlands
- Contact:
Re: Oh yes another 1973 rhd 2.4E
911's are surprisingly good at surviving accidents....
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
----------------------------------------------------
Jason
https://www.SweepingHand.co.uk
Rolex & Omega Watch Purchases & Sales

Jason
https://www.SweepingHand.co.uk
Rolex & Omega Watch Purchases & Sales

-
Bigfoot
- DDK slapper chatter
- Posts: 398
- Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 8:40 pm
Re: Oh yes another 1973 rhd 2.4E
Can anyone assist please, it appears that I'm missing the 'front axel protective plate' i.e. The undertray that protects the steering rack. You can buy lhd ones which is no good as my car rhd. I'm happy to purchase one in any condition as if poor condition it can be used as a template as Barry has offered to fabricate one. Failing that does anyone have one which I can hire/borrow for Barry to use as a template please..?
Adam
1973 911 2.4E
1974 911 2.7 Ratrod
1973 911 2.4E
1974 911 2.7 Ratrod
-
210bhp
- Nurse, I think I need some assistance
- Posts: 8248
- Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 12:28 am
- Location: Scotland
Re: Oh yes another 1973 rhd 2.4E
I can loan you a scruffy one Adam. I wonder if Barry would make a couple as I need one too.
I can send direct to Barry if required.
Regards
Mike
I can send direct to Barry if required.
Regards
Mike
_____________________________
73 RS (Sold)
67 S
Mint T (Sold)
996 Turbo (Sold)
73 2.4E (home after 25 years) and Sold again
73T targa (signal yellow project)
1953 Vauxhall Velox
914/6
1963 356B
https://www.mybespokeroom.com/
73 RS (Sold)
67 S
Mint T (Sold)
996 Turbo (Sold)
73 2.4E (home after 25 years) and Sold again
73T targa (signal yellow project)
1953 Vauxhall Velox
914/6
1963 356B
https://www.mybespokeroom.com/
-
aston
- DDK slapper chatter
- Posts: 494
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 9:54 pm
- Location: Glemsford, SUFFOLK.
Re: Oh yes another 1973 rhd 2.4E
Hi Adam - I need one too if Barry's prepared to make another one ?
Thanks.
Thanks.
Kieron.
viewtopic.php?f=28&t=48230
2.4E (1973).
Suzuki DRZ400S (2006).
BMW R1200RS (2018).
Yamaha XT500 (1978).
viewtopic.php?f=28&t=48230
2.4E (1973).
Suzuki DRZ400S (2006).
BMW R1200RS (2018).
Yamaha XT500 (1978).
-
Bigfoot
- DDK slapper chatter
- Posts: 398
- Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 8:40 pm
Re: Oh yes another 1973 rhd 2.4E
I have a new issue, turns out my wiper arms are from lhd 964
does anyone have any advice to obtaining a pair of correct ones please?
Adam
1973 911 2.4E
1974 911 2.7 Ratrod
1973 911 2.4E
1974 911 2.7 Ratrod
-
Bigfoot
- DDK slapper chatter
- Posts: 398
- Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 8:40 pm
Re: Oh yes another 1973 rhd 2.4E

Window/door frames back from the plater

Just waiting on Julian to return the clocks to complete the interior




Brand new window rubber from Porsche which doesn't fit!!

Finished at front end, just carpet to fit

And back on it's wheels
Adam
1973 911 2.4E
1974 911 2.7 Ratrod
1973 911 2.4E
1974 911 2.7 Ratrod
- hot66
- Moderator
- Posts: 19219
- Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2003 4:17 pm
- Location: North Yorkshire
Re: Oh yes another 1973 rhd 2.4E
That rear window seal is awful ... Is it a genuine one ?
James
1973 911 2.4S
1993 964 C2
2010 987 Spyder
1963 Honda C100 Supercub
Its not how fast you go, but how you go fast
1973 911 2.4S
1993 964 C2
2010 987 Spyder
1963 Honda C100 Supercub
Its not how fast you go, but how you go fast

