Page 4 of 277

Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 10:16 am
by PAUL CALDERBANK
I love a good looking watch as much as the next man (would love a white or blue dial heuer montreal)...but.... after looking at this thread and reading about watches costing several thousand pounds that cost £160 to service and have pretty poor time keeping/reliability (not to mention spending a lot of time in someones sock drawer), I have to say that I'm rapidly moving towards Helens school of thought on this topic.

C'mon guys admit it, once it's wrapped up in a good quality steel case, with a nice strap, you just can't beat a quartz movement!! :lol: :lol:

Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 12:13 pm
by dugsud
Just for timekeeping alone Quartz watches are of course the most accurate and cheap option just like a Toyota Prius is far more sensible than a classic 911 for going to Le Mans!

Quartz watches have no soul, a watch with a movement is like a living thing on your wrist.

Image

Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 12:31 pm
by Del
dugsud wrote:Just for timekeeping alone Quartz watches are of course the most accurate and cheap option just like a Toyota Prius is far more sensible than a classic 911 for going to Le Mans!

Quartz watches have no soul, a watch with a movement is like a living thing on your wrist.
A good point well made.

Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 12:33 pm
by sladey
phew you just beat me to it.its about way more than keeping time, just as driving your old porsche is about way more than getting from A to B.

ive got a 44 year old sub (same age as me) that doesnt keep great time, but i love it to bits.

Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 3:28 pm
by Evil J Guano
ive got a 44 year old sub (same age as me) that doesnt keep great time, but i love it to bits.


Snap me too, love it and never let me down in 25 years of service (touch wood), paid £180 for it!

Love it that much I took it's portrait!

Image

Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 12:43 pm
by Mike
Had a bit of good luck on e-bay over Christmas, I think a combination of quiet because of the holiday and some terrible pictures, meant that this one, as new, boxed with all the bits and paperwork, was overlooked. Came in at the last minute and got it for much less then half the price they normally go for :shock: if and when they actually come up.

Very pleased, a good start to the year 8) Now, as to whether I would actually be seen dead wearing it..............

Image
Image

Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 12:55 pm
by Del
fantastic purchase. you must be chuffed to bits with that.

Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 1:47 pm
by Steven
I've got a 1960s Omega Seamaster Automatic in stainless steel. They're a fraction on the cost of a new one and 'timeless' (excuse the pun), like a 356.

I also had a fake Rolex Submarine picked up for me in Hong Kong. I Compared it to my colleagues real one, very slight dome on the real watch's glass, apart from that neither of us could tell the difference. Put a 'Nato' strap on it, to tone down the bling, keeps good time looks quite nice.

Steven

Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 1:52 pm
by Steven
Evil J Guano wrote:Snap me too, love it and never let me down in 25 years of service (touch wood), paid £180 for it!
Crikey, that's cheap, even for one that doesn't keep good time.

Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:10 pm
by Ferry Man
Mike wrote:Now, as to whether I would actually be seen dead driving it..............
Nice looking watch Mike. Good deal too. Still, you're probably right about the car. I can understand your reluctance driving something so garish. :wink:

Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:44 pm
by Mike
Happy New Year Paul! :lol:

Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 3:00 pm
by sladey
Mike - can I ask who you're getting to do your all-over red/navy/pale blue body tattoo stripes?

I only ask because that lady on the discovery channel seems to be quite good - you could import her first :lol:

perhaps someone on the forum with a good knowledge of photoshop might be able to Mock something up so Mike can decide whether he wants to go with the uniform stripes down the front or curved stripes to mis-match the ones over the shoulder?

:lol: :lol:

Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 9:14 pm
by abash914
Concours, Mike. Think of the impression created by thgat watch strap....
BTW didn't need jack on 't way home, but have used it a couple of times and it's a bit a awight. Thanks again!! AA

Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 11:33 pm
by sladey
I posted elsewhere about the jack but want to add it here too - it's excellent! Spent most of Christmas day jacking up the kids (we know how to have fun in our house)

It's a quality piece of kit - thanks for sorting it out

Cheers

Mark

Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 11:55 pm
by Mike
Andrew and Mark, glad you liked them! Watches, Jacks...... boys and their toys, what are we like............ :roll: